Peer review
Program Committee
The MECHE 2022 program committee brings together researchers and practitioners from universities and institutions across Africa, Asia, Europe and the Middle East to review the submitted work.
- Abderrahmane Ezzahout, Mohammed V University, Morocco
- Allae Erraissi, Chouaib Doukkali University, Morocco
- Assem Abdel Hamied Moussa, Chief Eng, Egypt
- Ayyad Maafiri, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco
- Chahinez Mérièm Bentaouza, Mostaganem University, Algeria
- Chithirai Pon Selvan, Curtin University Dubai, UAE
- Dário Ferreira, University of Beira Interior, Portugal
- Ehan Sabah Shukri Askari, Middle Technical University (MTU), Iraq
- Eram Neha, Galgotias College of Engineering and Technology (GCET), Uttar Pradesh, India
- Felix J. Garcia Clemente, University of Murcia, Spain
- Francesco Zirilli, Sapienza Universita Roma, Italy
- Grzegorz Sierpiński, Silesian University of Technology, Poland
- Hafida Bouloiz, Researcher Professor, Ibn Zohr University, Morocco
- Jakhongir Shaturaev, University of Economics Islam Karimov, Uzbekistan
- Luisa Maria Arvide Cambra, University of Almeria, Spain
- Mani Sankar Dasgupta, BITS Pilani, India
- Mouad Banane, Hassan II University, Morocco
- Michail Kalogiannakis, University of Crete, Greece
- Miguel Caixinha, University of Beira Interior, Portugal
- Mohammad Nimafar, Islamic Azad University, Iran
- Murat Tolga Ozkan, Gazi University, Turkey
- Nuraini Binti Abdul Aziz, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
- Said Bouabdallah, University of Laghouat, Algeria
- Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay, University of Calcutta, India
- Shoeib Faraj, Technical and Vocational University, Tehran
- Tatyana A. Komleva, Odessa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ukraine
- Vijay Kumar Dalla, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, India
- W S Wong, University of Hong Kong, Department of Architecture, Hong Kong SAR
- Yas A. Alsultanny, College of Technical Communication, Uruk University, Iraq
Review process
Submission review
Each submitted paper was assigned to committee members with matching expertise. Reviewers assessed originality, technical soundness, clarity and relevance to the topics of interest.
Notification
Authors received the outcome of the review together with guidance for preparing the final manuscript. Accepted papers moved forward to the proceedings.
Publication
Accepted contributions were compiled into the conference proceedings. Learn how this worked on the accepted papers page.
Reviewer and research resources
External tools and professional bodies that support peer review and mechanical engineering research.